DARI TAFSIR ANTROPOSENTRIS KE TAFSIR EKOSENTRIS: REKONSTRUKSI FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DALAM PERSPEKTIF KRISIS LINGKUNGAN GLOBAL
Keywords:
ecological Islamic education, environmental exegesis, Islamic theology, philosophy of educationAbstract
The global environmental crisis indicates that ecological problems are not merely technical but paradigmatic, rooted in how humans conceptualize their relationship with nature. This article aims to analyze the interconnection between Qur’anic interpretation, Islamic theology, and philosophy of education in shaping an Islamic ecological paradigm, and to formulate a model of Islamic educational philosophy oriented toward sustainability. The study employs a library research approach using thematic exegetical analysis and a philosophy of education framework. The findings reveal that the dominance of anthropocentric interpretations in modern intellectual traditions has contributed to the theological legitimation of environmental exploitation. However, contemporary Islamic thought demonstrates a significant shift toward cosmological interpretations emphasizing divine unity, cosmic balance, and human responsibility as an ecological trust. Based on this foundation, the article proposes a model of ecological Islamic educational philosophy grounded in a relational ontology of God–human–nature, an integrative epistemology of revelation and science, and an axiology of sustainability. This model positions Islamic education as a transformative process that cultivates both ecological and spiritual consciousness, thereby offering a potential epistemological contribution of Islam to the global discourse on sustainable education.
References
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1978). Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
Berry, T. (1999). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. New York, NY: Bell Tower.
Capra, F. (1996). The Web Of Life: A New Scientific Understanding Of Living Systems. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Foltz, R. C., Denny, F. M., & Baharuddin, A. (Eds.). (2003). Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Trust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Izzi Dien, M. Y. (2000). The Environmental Dimensions of Islam. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.
Khalid, F. (2002). Islam and the Environment. Cambridge: Islamic Foundation.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (2004). Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nasr, S. H. (2007). The Need for a Sacred Science. London: Routledge.
________. (1997). Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. London: Allen & Unwin.
________. (1996). Religion and the Order of Nature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological Literacy: Education And The Transition To A Postmodern World. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Rahman, F. (1980). Major Themes of the Qur’an. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., … Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855,
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
